<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 3 Top Responsive LinkedIn Groups for Project Managers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.pmcolumn.com/3-top-responsive-linkedin-groups-for-project-managers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.pmcolumn.com/3-top-responsive-linkedin-groups-for-project-managers/</link>
	<description>Project Management Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 16:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marc Hammoud		</title>
		<link>https://www.pmcolumn.com/3-top-responsive-linkedin-groups-for-project-managers/#comment-26</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Hammoud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2018 23:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.pmcolumn.com/?p=4926#comment-26</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Iryna, Thank you for an amazing read. I literally enjoyed every line of it. You are absolutely right: a lot of what is published today on LinkedIn (and other social networks) is either spam, or one of its siblings.... Thank you for those 3 recommendations. The only addition I&#039;d make here is that those 3 groups are rather niches: PMI, Software Dev and PMP. We all need a more generic group where all PM issues go, be it PMP or other methodologies. Yes, you got me well: Why don&#039;t you start one such group and moderate it properly? I&#039;d be happy to contribute...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iryna, Thank you for an amazing read. I literally enjoyed every line of it. You are absolutely right: a lot of what is published today on LinkedIn (and other social networks) is either spam, or one of its siblings&#8230;. Thank you for those 3 recommendations. The only addition I&#8217;d make here is that those 3 groups are rather niches: PMI, Software Dev and PMP. We all need a more generic group where all PM issues go, be it PMP or other methodologies. Yes, you got me well: Why don&#8217;t you start one such group and moderate it properly? I&#8217;d be happy to contribute&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
